AffectiveAction

Because business has the heart to succeed

Menu

  • Home
  • Blog
  • General Management
  • Marketing
  • People Management
  • Innovation
  • Guest Bloggers
  • About
  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Recent Posts

    • Renewable Fuel for a Brilliant Life
    • How to Manage Women: Tips #2 and 3
    • How to Manage Women Tip # 1
    • Compassionate Capitalism
    • Stop That Focus Group!
    • To really change people’s behavior: Use the right word.
    • Is This the Coolest Company Ever?
  • Archive

  • Tags

    Affective Action B2B business business model career development career management cause marketing collaborate commercialization Conflict corporate responsibility customer networks demand generation Design Duarte Communications early sales Ecomagination effective communication Empathy employee engagement employee retention GE generative green marketing high performance high touch/low cost hiring HR human resources innovation innovative thinking Institute for the Future investment Jeff Immelt leadership lead generation management managing women market development marketing marketing automation marketing metrics motivation negotiate nurturing prospects outperform passion personalized marketing philanthropy philosophy philosophy and business Presentations product introductions project management project portfolio analysis project selection prospecting regulatory expansion results sales Santa Clara University social-media social entrepreneur social venture Social Venture incubator Strategy sustainability TEDx Presidio the buying process the customer view The Onion time to market time to ramp use case venture program
    • RSS - Posts
    • RSS - Comments
  • Subscribe in a reader

Browsing Category Marketing

Is Your Plan Bold Enough to be Safe?

June 24, 2012 · by Taia Ergueta

Careers and companies rise and fall based on being right about how much innovation to take on at any given time.  Reach too far and you risk ridicule, delays in time to market, and slow market development.  Not surprisingly, it often seemed safer to stick to the middle ground:  Investments in product enhancements or business extension for which there is strong supporting data.  But today, you shun the lunatic fringe at your own peril.  A small leap may not put you on firm ground.

 (The view straight down from High Bridge over Eagle Creek in the Columbia River Gorge)

A Case and Lessons Learned

I recently attended an EMBS talk on the latest scanning, parametrics, and 3-D printing developments.  The speaker was Scott Summit.  His company, Bespoke Innovations makes functionally and esthetically personalized prosthetic leg coverings.  For the coverings to achieve their first objective – restoring visual symmetry to the wearer’s body – they need an accurate digital scan of the person’s body.  What he recounted about the recent history of body scanning technology is a warning to all of us in any industry:

  • Approximately 3 years ago, to get a body scan he needed to take the customer to a lab that had a 1M machine and would provide scans at $800/scan.
  • Shortly thereafter, there were hand-held devices that cost $40,000 to $60,000 a piece and were very tricky to use.
  • Scott’s company developed their own scanner but it was soon overtaken in price/performance by…
  • A scanner that Microsoft developed. Shortly after that product became available…
  • Autodesk announced that anyone could download their 123D Catch software product for free. This enables anyone with a digital camera to take photos that the software then stitches together to create a 3-D model. For free.

Just hearing about this drop — from $1M to $0 in approximately 3 years —  is dizzying.  Can you imagine how each of those obviated product providers felt?  There are Five Stages of Grief, and I have seen Four Stages of Losing this kind of competitive fight:

  1. Denial:  “It’s a much less powerful product. “ “We only see them in Germany.”  “Our customers will never accept that.”
  2. More Enhancement:  “We will have better [fill in the blank: Specs? Bathrooms? You Tube videos?]”
  3. Capitulation:  “We have other more strategic businesses on which to focus”
  4. Rationalization:  “Sheila never invested enough in it.”  “Joe wasn’t the right person to lead it.”

The lessons that people take away from competitive failures are not always right.  Maybe there were other issues, but maybe the real lesson is this:  “We lost by playing it safe.  We did not target a big enough change; as a result, our investments went toward enhancements while others produced a much bigger leap in value for customers.”

There are definitely still situations that call for investments in minimally or moderately innovative projects.  But my point is that there are fewer of them now than before.  At the current pace of change and competition, many medium-impact projects simply do not make sense:  They will be rendered irrelevant soon or even before they are out the gate.

Implications:  How to Win in This Environment

  1. Become the voice, in your head and in your company, for the “Is it bold enough to be safe?” investment criterion.
  2. Become expert in  the techniques for evaluating bold ideas.  For every bold idea that is wildly successful there are 17 that turn out to be just wild.  More on this in future posts.
  3. Become expert in the techniques for implementing bold ideas in ways that manage risk.  More on this in future posts.

Input Welcome

Have you changed your project selection to match a faster pace of change?

How have you mitigated the higher risk associated with bigger leaps in contribution?

Share this:

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
Like Loading...

The 60 Second Pitch that Will Get you 2-3 Minutes of Attention: Maybe more!

June 18, 2012 · by Taia Ergueta

People decide in 30-60 seconds whether they will pay the slightest bit of attention to you. If you slay that dragon, and they decide to tune in, you get ~3 minutes (their attention span) to possibly earn an additional smidgen of their interest.

This is a “formula” for the 30-60 seconds. I will not do it justice. Its creator is communication expert, Sam Horn (http://www.intrigueagency.com/). She is extraordinary and I strongly recommend that you to try to hear her talk or buy her materials. In any case, I willshare my paraphrase of her ingenious and flexible formula for describing anything to anyone.

The power of the formula is that it engages the listener, tells your differentiation in that context, and gives the listener reasons to believe you. You are still You, just more Interesting. I think you’ll like You this way.

The Specifics and An Example

I will use the example of a startup company that I am mentoring, named salaUno. It is a Mexican eye clinic. Not excited by that description? Read on.

As Sam notes: This formula works whether you are answering the question, “What do you do?” at a cocktail party, or pitching your company at the biggest funding opportunity of your life.

What to Remember if You Don’t Remember the Formula

The formula works because it conforms to the human nature of the listener rather than the knowledge and ego of the speaker:

  • Our self-absorption halts briefly in response to new, surprising information.
  • Injecting an inspirational vision engages a different and valuable part of the brain. Factual small ideas may inform but they won’t attract or motivate.
  • The impact of a thing is always more interesting than the thing itself.
  • Dude, it’s not that you aren’t credible, but, well, bring external validation.

Input Welcome

          • Have you tried this with success? Send an example
          • Do you have suggested additions or modifications to this approach?

Share this:

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
Like Loading...

Why Would It Make Sense to Generate the Same Lead Over and Over?

May 30, 2012 · by Taia Ergueta

A product marketing manager asked me if we were just wasting money and time on lead generation:  The sales force had just informed him that they already knew all the customers that his lead generation campaign had produced.  Here is why generating the same lead repeatedly through Nurturing Demand Generation can be a very good use of money.

A customer in your target market is anyone who could use your product. A “lead” is someone who has the inclination and ability to buy your product in the near future.  A customer goes in and out of that “lead” state over time as their needs and ability to buy emerge, get met, and eventually re-emerge.

If you are new to the target market, then your lead generation objective is to find people new to your company who should get to know you before making a decision.  In contrast, if you have been in the market for a while you may have encountered many (maybe all) of the customers for your product.  In this case, you have additional lead generation objectives:  You want to make sure that you are top of mind and aware every time that they go into lead mode.  Since customers are not always shopping with intent to buy, lead generation efforts are well worth the money if they:

  1. Tip customers into “lead-dom” by stimulating an appetite for a new product
  2. Make you aware when a customer you may already know, has become an active shopper – a real lead rather than a passive customer.

In the past, it was the sales force’s job to keep your product top of mind during the times when a customer was not ready to buy.  Sales  was expected to know when a customer became an active lead/buyer by staying in constant touch.  Reality: This kind of “nurturing” was rarely practical outside of top accounts.  Today, most sales forces don’t have the time or access for this level of intimacy across the needed number of prospects.  Enter Marketing.

Marketing is the Cyrano de Bergerac to Sales’ Christian.  By keeping in contact with customers, giving them a range of enticing offers to which to respond and carefully assessing their responses, marketing can precipitate and detect when a customer turns into an active lead.  It is estimated that you need to communicate with a customer an average of 5 to 7 times before they are ready to buy from you.  Marketing automation makes this kind of Nurturing Demand Generation possible.

Just as Cyrano provided the poetry, marketing can use automation to provide the attentiveness and relevancy that customers seek. In this world, Marketing’s gift to Sales is not a new name, it is the gift of high efficiency — a stream of old and new customers who are informed, intrigued and feel cared for and ready to be influenced and buy.

Input welcome: I’ve met so many customers who complained that they felt ignored by the industry. Similarly, marketing and sales people always get a big motivation boost from getting to know customers better and meeting their relationship needs. The possibility of High Touch/Low Cost personalized marketing and customer relationship management is finally here.  It is in its early stage.  What has been your experience with this?

Share this:

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
Like Loading...

The Mother of All Metrics

May 2, 2012 · by Taia Ergueta

I nominate Achievement of Projected Sales Ramp Rate (Time to Ramp – “TTR”) as the single most important metric for your business.

To get resounding support for this, I’d better explain a few things.

First:  What is the Sales Ramp?

It is the projected pace and level of orders projected in the first year after a product is made available. (The number of years may differ depending on the level of innovation or industry.)

Why is it important?

There are both Financial and Effectiveness reasons. I got a big lesson in these in the PC business, where we had no more than 3 months after product introduction to make money on products that had taken 12-18 months to develop.  After three months, deep discounting would begin and you could abandon hope of making up the lost profits missed in those critical first months.  The PC case may be an extreme case, but many people seem to think they have all the time in the world to make money on a new product.  They don’t.  I love a good delusion as much as the next guy, but the cost of this one is way too high.

From a financial standpoint, if you miss that ramp timing, your competitive position, lifetime revenue, and return on investment are all severely damaged. If you expect to sell fifty units of a product in the first year and, instead, it takes two years to do it, the return on that R&D investment will be much lower than planned.  This is because of three unsympathetic and inescapable forces:

  • the time-value of money,
  • the impact of investing more money to get the same revenue, and
  • the fact that technology itself diminishes in competitiveness over time.

From an execution effectiveness standpoint, focusing on Time to Ramp ensures that you

  • Prepare the commercialization before introduction and
  • Identify and solve start-up problems early.

More on these topics below.

How is it Time to Ramp (TTR) different from Time to Market (TTM)?

Time to Market refers to time span from the start of development until the product will be introduced. The articulation is simple:  “We will introduce [the product] by [month] of [year].”

This metric became very popular as the value of being first to market and then the importance of fast product iteration became clear. Those are still very valid concepts, but a narrow focus on time to market has a dark side.

Figure 1

Time to Ramp measures the span from start of development to the time at which the initial targeted order rate is reached.

At the outset of a project this metric would read as follows:

“By [target date] we will have developed and introduced [the product] and will have achieved the following level of order dollars: [$______]. Projected ROI of the project: [____]”

On the designated target date, the metric report would state one of these:

    • “All Metrics achieved”, or
    • “TTR goal not met, new estimate for TTR is [ _____] Revised ROI: [____]”,
    • Or, in your case, “Metric exceeded by $_____, ROI exceeded by _____”

Figure 2 summarizes the benefits of this approach.

So you see, this isn’t really about the metric; it is about the behaviors that that metric brings to light and the positive behavior and process changes that it drives.  Some of those changes:

  • New introduction requirements that include more of what is actually necessary for the product to meet its early milestones
  • Ensuring that marketing and sales are aligned and investing in full commercialization rather than just introduction of the product
  • Elevating everyone’s position and engaging more of their talents by making them aware of and accountable for the project’s return on investment

So far I’ve highlighted the business benefits of adopting this metric, but among the most important benefits is that employees will be happier, broader and more confident in their future with the company.  I am sure that either as an employee or as a manager you have seen how much employees worry when they see important things that are not getting done.  They know or fear that those omissions will diminish the impact of their own hard work.  Adopting TTR metric not only shows that management “gets it”, it prompts employees to raise and address many common gaps.  Sure, that means more action items, but employees would rather have to prioritize from a full list of the actions that spell success than execute on a perilously incomplete list.  The more holistic view of project execution also requires functions to work together.  That kind of collaboration fuels employee development, flexibility and innovation.

Ok, I have to stop now before I find myself swearing that this metric can make your dog immortal or do away with world hunger.  Before I sign off:  Why the waterfall?  A great metric is like the land formation under a  waterfall.  Both naturally lead diverse sources of energy into a flow that has extraordinary power, reach and impact.

_____________________________________________________

Future posts:

  1. How to assess your Time to Ramp performance and solve key causes of underperformance.
  2. How to modify Product Introduction requirements to promote great TTR results.

[Waterfall photo by Kevin Connors ]

Share this:

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
Like Loading...

Marketing is Sales, Sales is Marketing

April 27, 2012 · by Taia Ergueta

Source: Africapic.com

Previously clear lines between Marketing and Sales are gone:  Instead there is now a Marketing-Sales Continuum. The technology, sociology and economics of B-to-B Marketing and Sales functions have changed fundamentally.  As a result either function can take over much of the ground of the other.  By all means, do panic a bit – and then, relax. Extinction is not at hand. In fact, the new realities offer new glory for people in both functions.  You can go get it.

FIRST:  WHY YOU NEED TO REBUILD THE PLANE IN MID-FLIGHT

Technology shifts. The noble and oh-so-loved Brochure cannot begin to compete with something like a multi-level micro-site with rich modular video content supplemented by a strong user forum.  Likewise, the continuous marketing din that surrounds every customer portends a sad fate for anyone doing one perfectly crafted Email Blast when his competitor is using marketing automation to do 5 orchestrated customer “touches” for the same price and effort.  Finally, social media is just hitting stride and has already created and destroyed businesses and sales models on a large scale.

The sociological shifts are as big and cross-generational.

  • Place:  Last Year’s Trade Shows are not where the majority of the world’s new young customers are getting and exchanging advice daily on what to see and buy.
  • Demographics are destiny.  Your geographic mix almost surely needs adjusting: Most people keep investing disproportionately in their past markets instead of the important new ones. And, yes, it will take a lot more work, because your biggest problem is not that your new customers are foreign to you, it is that you are foreign to them.
  • The dynamic of evaluation and decision-making have changed.  There is a network rather than a path to your customer.  How do you find out who is your desired customer’s most influential acquaintance and what and where he/she wants to know about your product?  Social media are the important new facilitators and accelerators of the primacy of customer communities.

The financial shifts are well known.  Corporations expect a steady rate of productivity improvement.  Sales forces are relatively expensive but efforts to limit them face the fact that those resources are difficult to leverage across geographies and product lines.  The picture is no rosier on the marketing side.  The effectiveness of Marketing spending often faces skepticism.

HOW IS MARKETING NOW SALES?

Marketing departments stagnate or decline if they do not get tangibly related to and accountable for creating real sales.  In the past it was safe for Marketing to create information and sales tools and then rely on the sales force to use them to reach and influence customers.  Marketing can now reach out very specifically and directly to the very people who were previously only contacted by Sales. OK, they can.  But should they?  Yes, yes, for at least two reasons:

  1. Because there is no alternative. The buying process has clearly changed and customers now conduct much of their product investigation and evaluation on line or in person with people other than a sales person. If Marketing does not understand that buying process thoroughly and get its company’s messages where the customers are conducting their investigations, those customers will be lost to the competition.
  2. Because generic information and sales tools have decreasing value. Customers don’t have the time or patience to figure out if or how your product meets their needs. Similarly, sales forces don’t have the time or knowledge to take all prospects through that process.  To surmount these barriers, information, messages, sales tools and communication channels must be very specific to each target market segment.

HOW IS SALES NOW MARKETING?

How does an experienced sales person meet a quota that goes up 12% with products that don’t increase in net price? Note that I said, “experienced”.  This isn’t a matter of learning to do the sales job.  You have become more effective over time and yes, you have cut into your personal time more and more to meet or exceed your quotas to date.  Now what?

The current sales force automation tools provide some of great capabilities including pipeline visibility, activity tracking and some outreach capabilities.  But progressive sales people need information and capabilities beyond that.   For example:

  • A CRM tool fully loaded with existing customers does nothing to expand the list of qualified prospects a sales person can address.  For that, there are services that mine public sources and can give you detailed information about what customers are doing, which products they currently use, etc.  But mining these sources requires a strategic marketing approach to sales development.
  • The capability to send automated check-in messages to customers does not provide the stratification and value added content that is really needed to evoke action or a response.  For that you need to:  1. Know your high priority customer segments and  2. Develop and offer each set of target customers a continuous stream of relevant content and non-transactional engagement opportunities.

Whether the sales objective is bringing in new customers (“hunting”) or building deeper buying from existing customers (“increasing share-of-wallet” or “gathering”), to reach the required new heights of their quotas, sales people need to apply focused marketing techniques.

RIDING THE MARKETING-SALES CONTINUUM WAVES 

As with all major changes, the technological, sociological and economic shifts described create waves of great opportunity for people who tune into them and act — and sogginess for those who don’t.  Here are three ways to ensure that you surf to success.

New You.

Each function had reached the point at which it’s productivity gains were slowing or coming heavily at the expense of the personal lives of its employees.  New marketing and sales automation and social media technologies are making large productivity and effectiveness leaps possible.  But you’ll only get their real value if you identify with the whole Continuum—not as a Marketing or Sales person, but as a Sales Development leader.

Through that lens you will see beyond arbitrary function boundaries and you will change your world.  You’ll probably become relentless about making tight, clear links from upstream of what you do through downstream of your actions, all the way to the ultimate results, sales.  Find the gaps and fill them — or make noise until someone else does so.

New Us:  Better Together

Marketing and Sales activities are often very loosely aligned. Everyone assumes that someone else is ensuring their disparate efforts and assumptions are adding up to the desired results.  Despite each group working very hard, relations between them often run from apathy to mutual sympathy to barely muffled acrimony.  Growth often falls far short of what can happen if both functions put collective effort into focused, aligned and technology-enabled sales development initiatives.

Marketing and sales teams can work together differently for higher aggressiveness and effectiveness.  Marketing can provide additional value added that feeds into a jointly developed blueprint for sales generation.  Sales can drive those sales generation blueprints that include:

    • Appropriate market goals tied to segment-specific customer intelligence,
    • An action plan with needed marketing and customer engagement tactics regardless of who does them and
    • The capture of leading metrics so that the marketing/sales effort can be adjusted frequently.

New.  Period.  Frontiers for Pioneers in both Functions

Find out what new inputs and outputs are possible by looking at competitors and, even more importantly, by looking at companies in other industries.  Learn and standout in your company by becoming a champion for a pilot in one new initiative every 6 months.  A few examples:

In the world of Big Data, many Marketing-Sales teams will soon be able to know every potential customer for their product and other relevant facts about them. Which function will make greater practical use of this capability?

Using Social Media, companies will truly be able to act as the “peer” and “partner” that they have always wanted to be for their customers. Which function will do so to create the highest quantifiable results?

The biggest value creators on Wall Street are now mathematicians whose algorithms exploit existing information in new ways to make profitable trades; is there analogous gold in your company’s customer information?

The future of your function is exciting — and it looks a lot like you.

Share this:

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
Like Loading...
Page 2 of 2 « Previous 1 2
  • Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • AffectiveAction
    • Join 41 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • AffectiveAction
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d