AffectiveAction

Because business has the heart to succeed

Menu

  • Home
  • Blog
  • General Management
  • Marketing
  • People Management
  • Innovation
  • Guest Bloggers
  • About
  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Recent Posts

    • Renewable Fuel for a Brilliant Life
    • How to Manage Women: Tips #2 and 3
    • How to Manage Women Tip # 1
    • Compassionate Capitalism
    • Stop That Focus Group!
    • To really change people’s behavior: Use the right word.
    • Is This the Coolest Company Ever?
  • Archive

  • Tags

    Affective Action B2B business business model career development career management cause marketing collaborate commercialization Conflict corporate responsibility customer networks demand generation Design Duarte Communications early sales Ecomagination effective communication Empathy employee engagement employee retention GE generative green marketing high performance high touch/low cost hiring HR human resources innovation innovative thinking Institute for the Future investment Jeff Immelt leadership lead generation management managing women market development marketing marketing automation marketing metrics motivation negotiate nurturing prospects outperform passion personalized marketing philanthropy philosophy philosophy and business Presentations product introductions project management project portfolio analysis project selection prospecting regulatory expansion results sales Santa Clara University social-media social entrepreneur social venture Social Venture incubator Strategy sustainability TEDx Presidio the buying process the customer view The Onion time to market time to ramp use case venture program
    • RSS - Posts
    • RSS - Comments
  • Subscribe in a reader

Browsing Tags time to market

Getting Great Customer Feedback on a New Technology

October 10, 2012 · by Taia Ergueta

You’ve got very cool new technology that thousands of labs will love. The product is ready. Rev up the Introduction Machine and sell, right? Senova Systems, a company for which I am consulting, is taking a different approach. Just before the full launch they have launched an Early Access Program. I thought you would find the concept and their decisions useful.

Senova has a developed a revolutionary new technology for measuring pH that takes time, risk, aggravation and cost and out of doing this very common measurement. (For more on this see their site: SenovaSystems.com)  Their first product is a handheld pH scanner called the “pHit scanner”, They have been testing the product internally all along and further testing is part of the manufacturing scale up and beta sites. But instead of launching it immediately in to the broad market, they are taking the time to do an Early Access Program (EAP).

 Why an EAP?

The CEO, Lee Leonard,  is a serial entrepreneur. He knows that his market comprises highly diverse applications and that there is no way for his team to test the product in all the ways that customers will use it.  He also knows that as great as the technology may be,  the user experience is just as important.  To ensure that they launch with the kind of confidence that only comes from deep customer knowledge, he is taking the time to do the Early Access Program.

How Many Customers to Involve

I have been involved with Early Access Programs before. An Early Access Program can take various forms. It can involve a small number of customers early in the development program, getting their input at critical junctures in the process. It can simply be a way of ensuring key customers that they will have the first units. In this case, Senova’s key objectives are to understand customer use cases thoroughly and to find any unknown corner case situations that stress some aspect of the product. For these purposes, the EAP will include a large (50) but selected set of customers. By selected, I mean that they will have customers apply and will choose a set that represents the broad range of applications that use pH measurement.

Nuts and Bolts: The Terms

Here are the 2 key parts of an EAP and the example of how Senova chose to accomplish them:

  • Incentive:  Just getting the chance to be among the first in their company or field to get their hands on a pHit is a big incentive for some customers to participate. But to ensure that the participants are real customers (not just curious technology aficionados), the Senova program is structured as a discounted Try and Buy: Each customer selected to be an Early Access Program participant, gets to purchase a pHit scanner at a 50% discount on the retail price of $1,650.00. (To give time for the “Try”, EAP customers won’t be billed until 30 days after delivery). These customers also get a money-back guarantee; if they are not fully satisfied with the scanner, they simply return it.

In addition, participating organizations will be publicly acknowledged as key influencers. (Customers can opt out of this if they prefer anonymity.)

  • Required Input From the Customer:  You need to be very specific about what you expect from customers in an EAP. It is common for customers to be eager to participate and then get too busy to do their part ( use the product, write an app note, or whatever else you have asked of them).

In return for the above, Senova asks its EAP customers to commit to the following:

    • Use the product under their normal laboratory conditions for 30 days.
    • Provide Senova with feedback on the user experience and technical performance through structured conversations and documents.

If you want a more complete example of how to describe or document such a  program, click here to see the Senova description and FAQs.

How to Choose the Customers

If you want participation during product development, you cannot afford to involve too many customers, so pick just a few from the most important target market(s). Your closest customers may not be the best participants.  For example don’t involve the most demanding customers if you want a minimum viable product market entry.  The intent is toto make sure you are meeting the target market’s needs solidly.

If you want to give some customers the first units either to establish key influencers or simply as reward or for their ego gratification, then your top customer list will drive the number involved.

If, like Senova, you want to experience a diversity of application areas deeply,  involve enough customers to  get a good sample of the full range. For example, Senova is taking applications from interested parties and will choose 50 customers that cover as broad a set of use scenarios as possible.

Bottom Line

Yes, conducting an EAP will require significant effort and attention. You may even postpone some revenue. But it is an investment in customer insight that will yield extremely high returns.

The rewards:

  • Additional product testing that can validate yours or find weaknesses early, when they are least costly to fix.
  • Develop close relationships with participating customers, leading to ongoing customer insight, potential influencing of other customers and maybe even longer term loyalty!
  • Usage information that can reveal additional needs, opportunities to improve design and user experience, opportunities to integrate activities or products that are upstream or downstream from your current product.
  • Service and self-service content.
  • Faster time-to-ramp based on more effective commercialization and sales efforts.
  • A more engaged internal team that gains the confidence and inspiration that only comes from close customer exposure.

Input Welcome

Have you done Early Access Programs?  If so, what has been your positive or negative experience with them.  If you want assistance with an EAP contact me by clicking here.

Share this:

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
Like Loading...

Is Your Plan Bold Enough to be Safe?

June 24, 2012 · by Taia Ergueta

Careers and companies rise and fall based on being right about how much innovation to take on at any given time.  Reach too far and you risk ridicule, delays in time to market, and slow market development.  Not surprisingly, it often seemed safer to stick to the middle ground:  Investments in product enhancements or business extension for which there is strong supporting data.  But today, you shun the lunatic fringe at your own peril.  A small leap may not put you on firm ground.

 (The view straight down from High Bridge over Eagle Creek in the Columbia River Gorge)

A Case and Lessons Learned

I recently attended an EMBS talk on the latest scanning, parametrics, and 3-D printing developments.  The speaker was Scott Summit.  His company, Bespoke Innovations makes functionally and esthetically personalized prosthetic leg coverings.  For the coverings to achieve their first objective – restoring visual symmetry to the wearer’s body – they need an accurate digital scan of the person’s body.  What he recounted about the recent history of body scanning technology is a warning to all of us in any industry:

  • Approximately 3 years ago, to get a body scan he needed to take the customer to a lab that had a 1M machine and would provide scans at $800/scan.
  • Shortly thereafter, there were hand-held devices that cost $40,000 to $60,000 a piece and were very tricky to use.
  • Scott’s company developed their own scanner but it was soon overtaken in price/performance by…
  • A scanner that Microsoft developed. Shortly after that product became available…
  • Autodesk announced that anyone could download their 123D Catch software product for free. This enables anyone with a digital camera to take photos that the software then stitches together to create a 3-D model. For free.

Just hearing about this drop — from $1M to $0 in approximately 3 years —  is dizzying.  Can you imagine how each of those obviated product providers felt?  There are Five Stages of Grief, and I have seen Four Stages of Losing this kind of competitive fight:

  1. Denial:  “It’s a much less powerful product. “ “We only see them in Germany.”  “Our customers will never accept that.”
  2. More Enhancement:  “We will have better [fill in the blank: Specs? Bathrooms? You Tube videos?]”
  3. Capitulation:  “We have other more strategic businesses on which to focus”
  4. Rationalization:  “Sheila never invested enough in it.”  “Joe wasn’t the right person to lead it.”

The lessons that people take away from competitive failures are not always right.  Maybe there were other issues, but maybe the real lesson is this:  “We lost by playing it safe.  We did not target a big enough change; as a result, our investments went toward enhancements while others produced a much bigger leap in value for customers.”

There are definitely still situations that call for investments in minimally or moderately innovative projects.  But my point is that there are fewer of them now than before.  At the current pace of change and competition, many medium-impact projects simply do not make sense:  They will be rendered irrelevant soon or even before they are out the gate.

Implications:  How to Win in This Environment

  1. Become the voice, in your head and in your company, for the “Is it bold enough to be safe?” investment criterion.
  2. Become expert in  the techniques for evaluating bold ideas.  For every bold idea that is wildly successful there are 17 that turn out to be just wild.  More on this in future posts.
  3. Become expert in the techniques for implementing bold ideas in ways that manage risk.  More on this in future posts.

Input Welcome

Have you changed your project selection to match a faster pace of change?

How have you mitigated the higher risk associated with bigger leaps in contribution?

Share this:

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
Like Loading...

The Mother of All Metrics

May 2, 2012 · by Taia Ergueta

I nominate Achievement of Projected Sales Ramp Rate (Time to Ramp – “TTR”) as the single most important metric for your business.

To get resounding support for this, I’d better explain a few things.

First:  What is the Sales Ramp?

It is the projected pace and level of orders projected in the first year after a product is made available. (The number of years may differ depending on the level of innovation or industry.)

Why is it important?

There are both Financial and Effectiveness reasons. I got a big lesson in these in the PC business, where we had no more than 3 months after product introduction to make money on products that had taken 12-18 months to develop.  After three months, deep discounting would begin and you could abandon hope of making up the lost profits missed in those critical first months.  The PC case may be an extreme case, but many people seem to think they have all the time in the world to make money on a new product.  They don’t.  I love a good delusion as much as the next guy, but the cost of this one is way too high.

From a financial standpoint, if you miss that ramp timing, your competitive position, lifetime revenue, and return on investment are all severely damaged. If you expect to sell fifty units of a product in the first year and, instead, it takes two years to do it, the return on that R&D investment will be much lower than planned.  This is because of three unsympathetic and inescapable forces:

  • the time-value of money,
  • the impact of investing more money to get the same revenue, and
  • the fact that technology itself diminishes in competitiveness over time.

From an execution effectiveness standpoint, focusing on Time to Ramp ensures that you

  • Prepare the commercialization before introduction and
  • Identify and solve start-up problems early.

More on these topics below.

How is it Time to Ramp (TTR) different from Time to Market (TTM)?

Time to Market refers to time span from the start of development until the product will be introduced. The articulation is simple:  “We will introduce [the product] by [month] of [year].”

This metric became very popular as the value of being first to market and then the importance of fast product iteration became clear. Those are still very valid concepts, but a narrow focus on time to market has a dark side.

Figure 1

Time to Ramp measures the span from start of development to the time at which the initial targeted order rate is reached.

At the outset of a project this metric would read as follows:

“By [target date] we will have developed and introduced [the product] and will have achieved the following level of order dollars: [$______]. Projected ROI of the project: [____]”

On the designated target date, the metric report would state one of these:

    • “All Metrics achieved”, or
    • “TTR goal not met, new estimate for TTR is [ _____] Revised ROI: [____]”,
    • Or, in your case, “Metric exceeded by $_____, ROI exceeded by _____”

Figure 2 summarizes the benefits of this approach.

So you see, this isn’t really about the metric; it is about the behaviors that that metric brings to light and the positive behavior and process changes that it drives.  Some of those changes:

  • New introduction requirements that include more of what is actually necessary for the product to meet its early milestones
  • Ensuring that marketing and sales are aligned and investing in full commercialization rather than just introduction of the product
  • Elevating everyone’s position and engaging more of their talents by making them aware of and accountable for the project’s return on investment

So far I’ve highlighted the business benefits of adopting this metric, but among the most important benefits is that employees will be happier, broader and more confident in their future with the company.  I am sure that either as an employee or as a manager you have seen how much employees worry when they see important things that are not getting done.  They know or fear that those omissions will diminish the impact of their own hard work.  Adopting TTR metric not only shows that management “gets it”, it prompts employees to raise and address many common gaps.  Sure, that means more action items, but employees would rather have to prioritize from a full list of the actions that spell success than execute on a perilously incomplete list.  The more holistic view of project execution also requires functions to work together.  That kind of collaboration fuels employee development, flexibility and innovation.

Ok, I have to stop now before I find myself swearing that this metric can make your dog immortal or do away with world hunger.  Before I sign off:  Why the waterfall?  A great metric is like the land formation under a  waterfall.  Both naturally lead diverse sources of energy into a flow that has extraordinary power, reach and impact.

_____________________________________________________

Future posts:

  1. How to assess your Time to Ramp performance and solve key causes of underperformance.
  2. How to modify Product Introduction requirements to promote great TTR results.

[Waterfall photo by Kevin Connors ]

Share this:

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
Like Loading...
  • Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • AffectiveAction
    • Join 41 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • AffectiveAction
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d